Re: which "wx2.6" should we use ?

Dave Page wrote:
>
>
>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Raphaël Enrici [mailto:blacknoz(at)club-internet(dot)fr]
>>Sent: 05 May 2005 21:03
>>To: Dave Page
>>Cc: Andreas Pflug; PgAdmin Hackers
>>Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] which "wx2.6" should we use ?
>>
>>Dave Page wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>>From: pgadmin-hackers-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
>>>>[mailto:pgadmin-hackers-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org] On Behalf Of
>>>>Raphaël Enrici
>>>>Sent: 05 May 2005 20:43
>>>>To: Andreas Pflug
>>>>Cc: PgAdmin Hackers
>>>>Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] which "wx2.6" should we use ?
>>>>
>>>> --with-flavour=pga3
>>>
>>>
>>> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>>>
>>>What the heck does that do?
>>
>>something I love! But, let's take a look to the content of the package
>>I'm building for wx2.6:
>>...
>>/usr/lib/wx/include/gtk2-unicode-debug-static-2.6-pga3/wx/
>>...
>>/usr/bin/wx-config->/usr/lib/wx/config/gtk2-unicode-debug-stat
>>ic-2.6-pga3
>>...
>>an so on...
>>
>>It helps me not clashing with files provided by other wx
>>packages for my
>>own package :)
>>
>>That's something I learnt from Ron in the end of last year when he was
>>preparing a wx 2.5 release for Debian.
>
>
> Very cool.

yes, but not compatible with our configure script. Just posted a mail
concerning this to Adam and pgadmin-hackers.

Raph