> On 16 Oct 2024, at 06:57, David G. Johnston <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> I’m for the status-quo. We don’t imply removal when we say deprecated, only that (usually) a better alternative exists. This setup meets our existing standards.
The status-quo is inconsistency, we sometimes remove features we've marked as
deprecated and sometimes they are kept.
--
Daniel Gustafsson