Re: Doc: shared_memory_size_in_huge_pages with the "SHOW" command.

From: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Seino Yuki <seinoyu(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Doc: shared_memory_size_in_huge_pages with the "SHOW" command.
Date: 2024-10-16 06:31:05
Message-ID: 755f74a1-d50a-4411-aed2-d8cf09764865@oss.nttdata.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2024/10/16 14:18, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 15, 2024 at 08:26:06PM -0500, Nathan Bossart wrote:
>> Well, the point is that you can't use "postgres -C" to view this GUC while
>> the server is running. I can see how the present wording might be
>> misinterpreted, though. Perhaps we should change this sentence to
>> something like:
>>
>> Note that the server must be shut down to view this runtime-computed
>> parameter with the postgres command.
>
> I'm OK with the "postgres command" addition.

Another idea is to use the same wording as for num_os_semaphores in runtime.sgml, like this:

This parameter can be viewed
before starting the server with a <command>postgres</command> command like:

Regards,

--
Fujii Masao
Advanced Computing Technology Center
Research and Development Headquarters
NTT DATA CORPORATION

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Daniel Gustafsson 2024-10-16 06:31:09 Re: Remove deprecated -H option from oid2name
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2024-10-16 06:05:27 Re: UUID v7