Re: 7.4 compatibility question

From: Michael Brusser <michael(at)synchronicity(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>
Cc: Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: 7.4 compatibility question
Date: 2003-10-22 17:33:34
Message-ID: DEEIJKLFNJGBEMBLBAHCOEDLDNAA.michael@synchronicity.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs pgsql-hackers

We integrate PostgreSQL with our product, which we ship to the end user.
We do read the release notes, they are important to us.
They don't have to be excruciatingly long, they can't be
ridiculously short and cryptic.
You have to find the golden spot in the middle. Just treat us
the way you want to be treated + some extra allowance for ignorance.

Mike.

> > Part of the reason the release notes are read is
> > because they are _readable_

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2003-10-22 18:04:58 Re: 7.4 compatibility question
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2003-10-22 17:29:21 Re: 7.4 compatibility question

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2003-10-22 18:04:58 Re: 7.4 compatibility question
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2003-10-22 17:29:21 Re: 7.4 compatibility question