Re: 7.4 compatibility question

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>, Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: 7.4 compatibility question
Date: 2003-10-22 17:29:21
Message-ID: 200310221729.h9MHTLT22629@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > As far as incrementally updating the release notes --- lots of our work
> > is incremental, meaning we fix X, then add Y, and Z, and the resulting
> > change is one release note entry (psql \d display improvements, for
> > example). Documenting them separately just leads to a mess of entries
> > that we have to consolidate at the end anyway.
>
> We do already have a practice of adding notes about significant changes
> to release.sgml as they are made. That's relatively new though, and I
> dunno if it's helped Bruce prepare the finished release notes or not.
> Bruce, did you use those notes at all this time?

I checked them to make sure they were already included in my CVS notes,
and I might have used some of its wording if it was better than mine.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Brusser 2003-10-22 17:33:34 Re: 7.4 compatibility question
Previous Message Tom Lane 2003-10-22 17:26:00 Re: 7.4 compatibility question

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Brusser 2003-10-22 17:33:34 Re: 7.4 compatibility question
Previous Message Tom Lane 2003-10-22 17:27:55 Re: integer ceiling in LIMIT and OFFSET