Re: 7.4 compatibility question

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>, Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: 7.4 compatibility question
Date: 2003-10-22 17:26:00
Message-ID: 17341.1066843560@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> As far as incrementally updating the release notes --- lots of our work
> is incremental, meaning we fix X, then add Y, and Z, and the resulting
> change is one release note entry (psql \d display improvements, for
> example). Documenting them separately just leads to a mess of entries
> that we have to consolidate at the end anyway.

We do already have a practice of adding notes about significant changes
to release.sgml as they are made. That's relatively new though, and I
dunno if it's helped Bruce prepare the finished release notes or not.
Bruce, did you use those notes at all this time?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2003-10-22 17:29:21 Re: 7.4 compatibility question
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2003-10-22 17:12:20 Re: 7.4 compatibility question

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2003-10-22 17:27:55 Re: integer ceiling in LIMIT and OFFSET
Previous Message Rod Taylor 2003-10-22 17:25:23 Re: integer ceiling in LIMIT and OFFSET