Re: 7.4 compatibility question

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: michael(at)synchronicity(dot)com
Cc: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>, Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: 7.4 compatibility question
Date: 2003-10-22 18:04:58
Message-ID: 200310221804.h9MI4wA01230@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs pgsql-hackers

Michael Brusser wrote:
> We integrate PostgreSQL with our product, which we ship to the end user.
> We do read the release notes, they are important to us.
> They don't have to be excruciatingly long, they can't be
> ridiculously short and cryptic.
> You have to find the golden spot in the middle. Just treat us
> the way you want to be treated + some extra allowance for ignorance.

The big question is whether the current release notes hit he right
balanced. Do they for you?

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Neil Conway 2003-10-22 18:26:56 Re: 7.4 compatibility question
Previous Message Michael Brusser 2003-10-22 17:33:34 Re: 7.4 compatibility question

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2003-10-22 18:10:59 Re: [HACKERS] Timestamp docs weirdness
Previous Message Michael Brusser 2003-10-22 17:33:34 Re: 7.4 compatibility question