| From: | "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)justatheory(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Erik Wienhold <ewie(at)ewie(dot)name> |
| Subject: | Re: ❓ JSON Path Dot Precedence |
| Date: | 2024-07-08 16:54:48 |
| Message-ID: | D9FCE3D4-1DD0-4769-8B2A-A9FEE6F01C3C@justatheory.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Jul 8, 2024, at 12:17, David G. Johnston <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> We created a data type named: jsonpath. Does the standard actually have that data type and defined parsing behavior or does it just have functions where one of the inputs is text whose contents are a path expression?
Ah, got it.
D
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2024-07-08 17:03:28 | Re: BUG #18348: Inconsistency with EXTRACT([field] from INTERVAL); |
| Previous Message | Michael Christofides | 2024-07-08 16:54:33 | Re: Detoasting optionally to make Explain-Analyze less misleading |