Re: ❓ JSON Path Dot Precedence

From: "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)justatheory(dot)com>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Erik Wienhold <ewie(at)ewie(dot)name>
Subject: Re: ❓ JSON Path Dot Precedence
Date: 2024-07-08 16:17:09
Message-ID: CAKFQuwZypRzFbv8MZ62dOo2Xs=mZ9HB5sMi02K46Mcq0vWSbtQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Jul 8, 2024 at 9:12 AM David E. Wheeler <david(at)justatheory(dot)com>
wrote:

> On Jul 8, 2024, at 12:05, David G. Johnston <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>
> wrote:
>
> > Does the standard even have a separate type here or is that our
> implementation detail invention?
>
> Sorry, separate type for what?
>
>
We created a data type named: jsonpath. Does the standard actually have
that data type and defined parsing behavior or does it just have functions
where one of the inputs is text whose contents are a path expression?

David J.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Paul Jungwirth 2024-07-08 16:32:55 Re: Add GiST support for mixed-width integer operators
Previous Message David E. Wheeler 2024-07-08 16:11:58 Re: ❓ JSON Path Dot Precedence