| From: | "Tristan Partin" <tristan(at)neon(dot)tech> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Robert Haas" <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "Heikki Linnakangas" <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Shlok Kyal" <shlok(dot)kyal(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: psql not responding to SIGINT upon db reconnection |
| Date: | 2024-01-12 17:13:40 |
| Message-ID: | CYCWA43RK8AH.11BZB0P45NOD5@neon.tech |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri Jan 12, 2024 at 10:45 AM CST, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 8, 2024 at 1:03 AM Tristan Partin <tristan(at)neon(dot)tech> wrote:
> > I think the way to go is to expose some variation of libpq's
> > pqSocketPoll(), which I would be happy to put together a patch for.
> > Making frontends, psql in this case, have to reimplement the polling
> > logic doesn't strike me as fruitful, which is essentially what I have
> > done.
>
> I encourage further exploration of this line of attack. I fear that if
> I were to commit something like what you've posted up until now,
> people would complain that that code was too ugly to live, and I'd
> have a hard time telling them that they're wrong.
Completely agree. Let me look into this. Perhaps I can get something up
next week or the week after.
--
Tristan Partin
Neon (https://neon.tech)
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Nathan Bossart | 2024-01-12 17:21:52 | Re: introduce dynamic shared memory registry |
| Previous Message | Tomas Vondra | 2024-01-12 17:03:15 | Re: Custom explain options |