| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tristan Partin <tristan(at)neon(dot)tech> |
| Cc: | Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Shlok Kyal <shlok(dot)kyal(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: psql not responding to SIGINT upon db reconnection |
| Date: | 2024-01-12 16:45:06 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmoZb1Ojhw9numxWp8nCioh_wULxOcYCQ6Jwku4t_e43PkA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Jan 8, 2024 at 1:03 AM Tristan Partin <tristan(at)neon(dot)tech> wrote:
> I think the way to go is to expose some variation of libpq's
> pqSocketPoll(), which I would be happy to put together a patch for.
> Making frontends, psql in this case, have to reimplement the polling
> logic doesn't strike me as fruitful, which is essentially what I have
> done.
I encourage further exploration of this line of attack. I fear that if
I were to commit something like what you've posted up until now,
people would complain that that code was too ugly to live, and I'd
have a hard time telling them that they're wrong.
--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2024-01-12 16:50:00 | Re: Emit fewer vacuum records by reaping removable tuples during pruning |
| Previous Message | Tomas Vondra | 2024-01-12 16:42:39 | Re: index prefetching |