Re: introduce dynamic shared memory registry

From: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: introduce dynamic shared memory registry
Date: 2024-01-12 17:21:52
Message-ID: 20240112172152.GA3803561@nathanxps13
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Here's a new version of the patch set in which I've attempted to address
the feedback in this thread. Note that 0001 is being tracked in a separate
thread [0], but it is basically a prerequisite for adding the documentation
for this feature, so that's why I've also added it here.

[0] https://postgr.es/m/20240112041430.GA3557928%40nathanxps13

--
Nathan Bossart
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com

Attachment Content-Type Size
v6-0001-reorganize-shared-memory-and-lwlocks-documentatio.patch text/x-diff 9.3 KB
v6-0002-add-dsm-registry.patch text/x-diff 22.5 KB
v6-0003-use-dsm-registry-for-pg_prewarm.patch text/x-diff 3.1 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Abhijit Menon-Sen 2024-01-12 17:23:08 Re: Report planning memory in EXPLAIN ANALYZE
Previous Message Tristan Partin 2024-01-12 17:13:40 Re: psql not responding to SIGINT upon db reconnection