| From: | Ioana Danes <ioanadanes(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Francisco Olarte <folarte(at)peoplecall(dot)com>, "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Corrupted Data ? |
| Date: | 2016-08-12 18:51:55 |
| Message-ID: | CAPg0s+5q=7hunc8r6YhV82OCszD=XcPru6N4tUMS3PiPD3dVhA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 2:50 PM, Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com>
wrote:
> On 08/12/2016 08:30 AM, Ioana Danes wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>
>
>>
>> The db3 database is on a different machine from all the other
>> databases you set up, correct?
>>
>> Yes, they are all different vms first 3 dbs are on the same cluster but
>> drdb is a remote machine,
>>
>>
> This rattled around in my head and got less obvious with time:) Probably
> because cluster has different meanings depending on whether you are talking
> about Postgres or VMs. Right now I am imagining:
>
> Physical machine 1 | Physical machine 2
> |
> VM1 VM2 VM3 | VM1
> db1 db2 db3 | drdb
>
> where each VM has its own Postgres cluster
>
> Is the above correct?
>
> yes correct, I should have been more clear,
>
> --
> Adrian Klaver
> adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com
>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Adrian Klaver | 2016-08-12 19:01:15 | Re: Corrupted Data ? |
| Previous Message | Adrian Klaver | 2016-08-12 18:50:18 | Re: Corrupted Data ? |