| From: | Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Ioana Danes <ioanadanes(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Francisco Olarte <folarte(at)peoplecall(dot)com>, "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Corrupted Data ? |
| Date: | 2016-08-12 18:50:18 |
| Message-ID: | c8f3cd02-03f8-373d-2b8c-626a47b8dc03@aklaver.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On 08/12/2016 08:30 AM, Ioana Danes wrote:
>
>
>
>
> The db3 database is on a different machine from all the other
> databases you set up, correct?
>
> Yes, they are all different vms first 3 dbs are on the same cluster but
> drdb is a remote machine,
>
This rattled around in my head and got less obvious with time:) Probably
because cluster has different meanings depending on whether you are
talking about Postgres or VMs. Right now I am imagining:
Physical machine 1 | Physical machine 2
|
VM1 VM2 VM3 | VM1
db1 db2 db3 | drdb
where each VM has its own Postgres cluster
Is the above correct?
--
Adrian Klaver
adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Ioana Danes | 2016-08-12 18:51:55 | Re: Corrupted Data ? |
| Previous Message | Melvin Davidson | 2016-08-12 18:15:10 | Re: Critical failure of standby |