Re: Postgresql in a Virtual Machine

From: Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Dong Ye <yed(at)vmware(dot)com>
Cc: "Gudmundsson Martin (mg)" <martin(dot)mg(dot)gudmundsson(at)volvo(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>, "pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Postgresql in a Virtual Machine
Date: 2013-11-28 18:40:10
Message-ID: CAOR=d=1FTY2o6Z-EgeqpGxSxjrTZFyWM9yR9pEeo8K2KnYtNKQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 7:58 PM, Dong Ye <yed(at)vmware(dot)com> wrote:

> As Heikki commented, VMware recently compared Postgres performance in
> an ESX (5.1) VM versus in a comparable native Linux. We saw 1.
> ESX-level locking causes no vertical scalability degradation, 2.

FYI Vmware has an optimized version of Postgresql for use on VSphere
etc: http://www.vmware.com/products/vfabric-postgres/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2013-11-29 01:41:58 Re: Postgresql in a Virtual Machine
Previous Message Dong Ye 2013-11-28 18:11:31 Re: Postgresql in a Virtual Machine