| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Dong Ye <yed(at)vmware(dot)com>, "Gudmundsson Martin (mg)" <martin(dot)mg(dot)gudmundsson(at)volvo(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>, "pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Postgresql in a Virtual Machine |
| Date: | 2013-11-29 01:41:58 |
| Message-ID: | CAB7nPqQSKcXrs0=11wwuCX0+cqJ-7iCMx2qcVxUgmxbipFxmWQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 3:40 AM, Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 7:58 PM, Dong Ye <yed(at)vmware(dot)com> wrote:
>
>> As Heikki commented, VMware recently compared Postgres performance in
>> an ESX (5.1) VM versus in a comparable native Linux. We saw 1.
>> ESX-level locking causes no vertical scalability degradation, 2.
>
> FYI Vmware has an optimized version of Postgresql for use on VSphere
> etc: http://www.vmware.com/products/vfabric-postgres/
There is actually no fork of the core in vFabric Postgres, Postgres
core is unmodified as of release 9.3. Have a look at the release
notes:
https://www.vmware.com/support/vfabric-postgres/doc/vfabric-postgres-93-release-notes.html
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jan Michel | 2013-11-29 22:07:59 | One query run twice in parallel results in huge performance decrease |
| Previous Message | Scott Marlowe | 2013-11-28 18:40:10 | Re: Postgresql in a Virtual Machine |