pg_cancel_backend and pg_terminate_backend

From: Wells Oliver <wells(dot)oliver(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: pgsql-admin <pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: pg_cancel_backend and pg_terminate_backend
Date: 2023-04-19 19:41:54
Message-ID: CAOC+FBVZFVSF1ntpf7UwQ==YA1KaerSrH0_BH+pmczEp88r2Ug@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin

I usually prefer pg_cancel_backend because it seems.. nicer, but lately
I've had a troublesome user who leaves transactions open and I've scripted
up a call to pg_terminate_backend after 60 minutes in an idle transaction.
It works well.

Question: is there any server impact beyond that user's transaction when
calling pg_terminate_backend? I feel like there _used_ to be, maybe in PG9,
where I recall maybe seeing a server disconnect or something when using
terminate.

Just curious about this approach. Thanks.

--
Wells Oliver
wells(dot)oliver(at)gmail(dot)com <wellsoliver(at)gmail(dot)com>

Responses

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message MichaelDBA 2023-04-19 19:46:29 Re: pg_cancel_backend and pg_terminate_backend
Previous Message Sbob 2023-04-19 16:24:17 PostgreSQL Logical Replication Questions