Re: pg_cancel_backend and pg_terminate_backend

From: Thomas Kellerer <shammat(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: pgsql-admin(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pg_cancel_backend and pg_terminate_backend
Date: 2023-04-19 20:10:59
Message-ID: c43689c6-1aa3-9258-09a7-de8046699dc5@gmx.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin

Wells Oliver schrieb am 19.04.2023 um 21:41:
> I usually prefer pg_cancel_backend because it seems.. nicer, but
> lately I've had a troublesome user who leaves transactions open and
> I've scripted up a call to pg_terminate_backend after 60 minutes in
> an idle transaction. It works well.

Why don't you use the idle_in_transaction_session_timeout to do this automatically?

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Wells Oliver 2023-04-19 20:13:18 Re: pg_cancel_backend and pg_terminate_backend
Previous Message Wells Oliver 2023-04-19 19:54:00 Re: pg_cancel_backend and pg_terminate_backend