| From: | Matthieu Rigal <matt(dot)rigal(at)googlemail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Oleksandr Shulgin <oleksandr(dot)shulgin(at)zalando(dot)de> |
| Cc: | Vladimir Ryabtsev <greatvovan(at)gmail(dot)com>, Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com>, Daniele Varrazzo <daniele(dot)varrazzo(at)gmail(dot)com>, psycopg(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: psycopg is the new psycopg3? |
| Date: | 2020-11-11 08:44:13 |
| Message-ID: | CANygOGMT+fDUAGUdA7YdYVLoQRV3+3M0foST-F9QsZveoB6DDA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | psycopg |
I do also second that opinion. Also, the problem of "3" being connotated in
Python is fading out. Nobody should be scared by a "3" anymore...
My 3.9 cents
Le mer. 11 nov. 2020 à 09:30, Oleksandr Shulgin <
oleksandr(dot)shulgin(at)zalando(dot)de> a écrit :
> On Tue, Nov 10, 2020 at 7:27 PM Vladimir Ryabtsev <greatvovan(at)gmail(dot)com>
> wrote:
>
>> As long as psycopg2 is not disappearing anywhere, psycopg3 seems better.
>> New users will interpret psycopg2 as "more advanced psycopg".
>>
>
> I second that opinion. Also, a suggestion to skip "3" and go with "4"
> doesn't seem to help against the Python version confusion concern, assuming
> there is Python4 in some (distant?) future.
>
> My 3¢,
> --
> Alex
>
>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Federico Di Gregorio | 2020-11-11 08:47:36 | Re: psycopg is the new psycopg3? |
| Previous Message | Oleksandr Shulgin | 2020-11-11 08:30:08 | Re: psycopg is the new psycopg3? |