| From: | Federico Di Gregorio <fog(at)dndg(dot)it> |
|---|---|
| To: | psycopg(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: psycopg is the new psycopg3? |
| Date: | 2020-11-11 08:47:36 |
| Message-ID: | 1dfca7ba-f4ed-3c10-87c2-e35e0df8800a@dndg.it |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | psycopg |
On 11/11/20 09:44, Matthieu Rigal wrote:
> I do also second that opinion. Also, the problem of "3" being connotated
> in Python is fading out. Nobody should be scared by a "3" anymore...
>
> My 3.9 cents
>
> Le mer. 11 nov. 2020 à 09:30, Oleksandr Shulgin
> <oleksandr(dot)shulgin(at)zalando(dot)de <mailto:oleksandr(dot)shulgin(at)zalando(dot)de>> a
> écrit :
>
> On Tue, Nov 10, 2020 at 7:27 PM Vladimir Ryabtsev
> <greatvovan(at)gmail(dot)com <mailto:greatvovan(at)gmail(dot)com>> wrote:
>
> As long as psycopg2 is not disappearing anywhere, psycopg3 seems
> better.
> New users will interpret psycopg2 as "more advanced psycopg".
>
>
> I second that opinion. Also, a suggestion to skip "3" and go with
> "4" doesn't seem to help against the Python version confusion
> concern, assuming there is Python4 in some (distant?) future.
Reading all the messages I have second toughts. If psycopg2 is here to
stay, i.e., if it will not be completely replaced by "psycopg3" (and by
completely I mean shutting down everything about it) then we will have
the following situation:
psycopg2 version 2.x.y
psycopg version 3.w.z
that at first sight is a bit confusing, isn't it?
federico
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Daniele Varrazzo | 2020-11-13 16:34:37 | First psycopg3 docs |
| Previous Message | Matthieu Rigal | 2020-11-11 08:44:13 | Re: psycopg is the new psycopg3? |