Re: psycopg is the new psycopg3?

From: Oleksandr Shulgin <oleksandr(dot)shulgin(at)zalando(dot)de>
To: Vladimir Ryabtsev <greatvovan(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com>, Daniele Varrazzo <daniele(dot)varrazzo(at)gmail(dot)com>, psycopg(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: psycopg is the new psycopg3?
Date: 2020-11-11 08:30:08
Message-ID: CACACo5T+PBVTTgAASbEqK6cZQDwKDNSiPvfvCHsKHU3d1_Berg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: psycopg

On Tue, Nov 10, 2020 at 7:27 PM Vladimir Ryabtsev <greatvovan(at)gmail(dot)com>
wrote:

> As long as psycopg2 is not disappearing anywhere, psycopg3 seems better.
> New users will interpret psycopg2 as "more advanced psycopg".
>

I second that opinion. Also, a suggestion to skip "3" and go with "4"
doesn't seem to help against the Python version confusion concern, assuming
there is Python4 in some (distant?) future.

My 3¢,
--
Alex

In response to

Responses

Browse psycopg by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Matthieu Rigal 2020-11-11 08:44:13 Re: psycopg is the new psycopg3?
Previous Message Daniele Varrazzo 2020-11-11 00:48:17 Re: Using composite types in psycopg3