Re: Best tools to monitor and fine tune postgres

People in any mailing lists are not free consultants. They expect their
time to be valued and they expect the OP to at least do some research
before posting

On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 9:56 PM Hemil Ruparel <hemilruparel2002(at)gmail(dot)com>
wrote:

> Refer to this page for archives: https://www.postgresql.org/list/
>
> On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 9:55 PM Atul Kumar <akumar14871(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
>> Again Thanks alot David for ur response.
>>
>> You expect everyone to be perfect which cannot happen.
>>
>> And related to thread, if someone has joined this thread today then it is
>> obvious that he may not be able to find the previous threads as well.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Regards
>> Atul
>>
>> On Friday, January 15, 2021, David G. Johnston <
>> david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 8:56 AM Atul Kumar <akumar14871(at)gmail(dot)com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi o1bigtenor,
>>>>
>>>> Now what will you say about below query that he should have come with
>>>> some research before asking here ?
>>>>
>>>
>>> Yes. The question gets asked frequently so if one searches the archive
>>> usually you'll get a thread from the past 6 months or so which is usually
>>> recent enough. Plus lots of people publish blog posts and articles on the
>>> topic, which are probably more well written and researched than
>>> off-the-cuff replies to a mailing list would be. At least posting "hey, I
>>> found these three tools, and am leaning toward such-and-such because of
>>> reasons, does anyone have any thoughts I should consider?" would should the
>>> effort and allow for better responses since at least some background is
>>> given. Knowing generally how the poster uses PostgreSQL also helps and
>>> should be included.
>>>
>>> A posting like this I'll usually just ignore since I know that answers
>>> already exist to be found, and it is not something that I have chosen to
>>> become a "librarian/interactive assistant" for - I relegate to the
>>> documentation for that.
>>>
>>> David J.
>>>
>>>