Re: Best tools to monitor and fine tune postgres

http://catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html

On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 9:58 PM Atul Kumar <akumar14871(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> And basically you are improving your knowledge as you are expecting those
> questions the answers of which you dont know about.
>
> Thats why you seem to not to be helpful and somehow stopping others to not
> to be helpful.
>
> I don’t find find it wrong if any new guy asking the question that has
> been repeated 1000 times earlier, if I know the answer I WILL RESPOND 1000
> TIMES, “unlike you”.
>
>
>
>
>
> On Friday, January 15, 2021, Atul Kumar <akumar14871(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
>> Again Thanks alot David for ur response.
>>
>> You expect everyone to be perfect which cannot happen.
>>
>> And related to thread, if someone has joined this thread today then it is
>> obvious that he may not be able to find the previous threads as well.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Regards
>> Atul
>>
>> On Friday, January 15, 2021, David G. Johnston <
>> david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 8:56 AM Atul Kumar <akumar14871(at)gmail(dot)com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi o1bigtenor,
>>>>
>>>> Now what will you say about below query that he should have come with
>>>> some research before asking here ?
>>>>
>>>
>>> Yes. The question gets asked frequently so if one searches the archive
>>> usually you'll get a thread from the past 6 months or so which is usually
>>> recent enough. Plus lots of people publish blog posts and articles on the
>>> topic, which are probably more well written and researched than
>>> off-the-cuff replies to a mailing list would be. At least posting "hey, I
>>> found these three tools, and am leaning toward such-and-such because of
>>> reasons, does anyone have any thoughts I should consider?" would should the
>>> effort and allow for better responses since at least some background is
>>> given. Knowing generally how the poster uses PostgreSQL also helps and
>>> should be included.
>>>
>>> A posting like this I'll usually just ignore since I know that answers
>>> already exist to be found, and it is not something that I have chosen to
>>> become a "librarian/interactive assistant" for - I relegate to the
>>> documentation for that.
>>>
>>> David J.
>>>
>>>