From: | Hemil Ruparel <hemilruparel2002(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Atul Kumar <akumar14871(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>, o1bigtenor <o1bigtenor(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, "svsn2(at)yahoo(dot)com" <svsn2(at)yahoo(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: Best tools to monitor and fine tune postgres |
Date: | 2021-01-15 16:26:52 |
Message-ID: | CANW1aT_NrG6-h_v6kv5ce2tMBkGFU0EQuZUSGbCXdZiW4F+9CQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Refer to this page for archives: https://www.postgresql.org/list/
On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 9:55 PM Atul Kumar <akumar14871(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Again Thanks alot David for ur response.
>
> You expect everyone to be perfect which cannot happen.
>
> And related to thread, if someone has joined this thread today then it is
> obvious that he may not be able to find the previous threads as well.
>
>
>
>
> Regards
> Atul
>
> On Friday, January 15, 2021, David G. Johnston <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>
> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 8:56 AM Atul Kumar <akumar14871(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi o1bigtenor,
>>>
>>> Now what will you say about below query that he should have come with
>>> some research before asking here ?
>>>
>>
>> Yes. The question gets asked frequently so if one searches the archive
>> usually you'll get a thread from the past 6 months or so which is usually
>> recent enough. Plus lots of people publish blog posts and articles on the
>> topic, which are probably more well written and researched than
>> off-the-cuff replies to a mailing list would be. At least posting "hey, I
>> found these three tools, and am leaning toward such-and-such because of
>> reasons, does anyone have any thoughts I should consider?" would should the
>> effort and allow for better responses since at least some background is
>> given. Knowing generally how the poster uses PostgreSQL also helps and
>> should be included.
>>
>> A posting like this I'll usually just ignore since I know that answers
>> already exist to be found, and it is not something that I have chosen to
>> become a "librarian/interactive assistant" for - I relegate to the
>> documentation for that.
>>
>> David J.
>>
>>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Atul Kumar | 2021-01-15 16:28:12 | Re: Best tools to monitor and fine tune postgres |
Previous Message | David G. Johnston | 2021-01-15 16:26:10 | Re: Accounting for between table correlation |