Re: [PATCH] Add regression tests of ecpg command notice (error / warning)

On Fri, Feb 28, 2025 at 11:27 PM Fujii Masao
<masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com> wrote:
> On 2025/02/28 9:24, Ryo Kanbayashi wrote:
> > I have rewrote my patch on TAP test sttyle :)
> > File for build are also updated.
>
> Thanks for updating the patch!

Thanks for review:)

>
> + 'tests': [
> + 't/001_ecpg_notice.pl',
> + 't/002_ecpg_notice_informix.pl',
>
> Since neither test emits "notice" messages, shouldn't the test file
> names be revised to reflect this?

I replaced "notice" to "err_warn_msg"

> Also, I'm unsure if it's ideal to place input files directly under
> the "t" directory. I looked for similar TAP tests with input files,
> but I couldn't find any examples to guide this decision...

I couldn't too. So places are not changed.

> +program_help_ok('ecpg');
> +program_version_ok('ecpg');
> +program_options_handling_ok('ecpg');
> +command_fails(['ecpg'], 'ecpg without arguments fails');
>
> These checks seem unnecessary in 002 since they're already covered in 001.

I reflected above.

---
Great regards,
Ryo Kanbayashi