Re: [PATCH] Add regression tests of ecpg command notice (error / warning)

On 2025/02/28 9:24, Ryo Kanbayashi wrote:
> I have rewrote my patch on TAP test sttyle :)
> File for build are also updated.

Thanks for updating the patch!

+ 'tests': [
+ 't/001_ecpg_notice.pl',
+ 't/002_ecpg_notice_informix.pl',

Since neither test emits "notice" messages, shouldn't the test file
names be revised to reflect this?

Also, I'm unsure if it's ideal to place input files directly under
the "t" directory. I looked for similar TAP tests with input files,
but I couldn't find any examples to guide this decision...

+program_help_ok('ecpg');
+program_version_ok('ecpg');
+program_options_handling_ok('ecpg');
+command_fails(['ecpg'], 'ecpg without arguments fails');

These checks seem unnecessary in 002 since they're already covered in 001.

Regards,

--
Fujii Masao
Advanced Computing Technology Center
Research and Development Headquarters
NTT DATA CORPORATION