From: | Richard Guo <guofenglinux(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | John Naylor <john(dot)naylor(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
Cc: | Japin Li <japinli(at)hotmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Typo in pg_db_role_setting.h |
Date: | 2022-08-02 07:37:58 |
Message-ID: | CAMbWs4_vvwj-Q8AP=SW-wu6YTx=QomQMVC5pqXptSb+-eFBAyA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Aug 2, 2022 at 12:13 PM John Naylor <john(dot)naylor(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
wrote:
>
> On Tue, Aug 2, 2022 at 10:06 AM Richard Guo <guofenglinux(at)gmail(dot)com>
> wrote:
> >
> > I'm not sure that we should remove such comments. And a rough search
> > shows that there are much more places with this kind of comments, such
> > as below:
> >
> > nbtxlog transam readfuncs walreceiver buffile bufmgr fd latch pmsignal
> > procsignal sinvaladt logtape rangetypes
>
> I was talking only about catalog/pg_*.c functions, as in Japin Li's latest
> patch. You didn't mention whether your examples fall in the category Tom
> mentioned upthread, so I'm not sure what your angle is.
>
Sorry I forgot to mention that. The examples listed upthread all contain
such comment in foo.h saying 'prototypes for functions in foo.c'. For
instance, in buffile.h, there is comment saying
/*
* prototypes for functions in buffile.c
*/
So if we remove such comments, should we also do so for those cases?
Thanks
Richard
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Kyotaro Horiguchi | 2022-08-02 07:44:23 | Re: Strange behavior with polygon and NaN |
Previous Message | Bharath Rupireddy | 2022-08-02 07:25:01 | Generalize ereport_startup_progress infrastructure |