From: | Skorpeo Skorpeo <skorpeo11(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Json table/column design question |
Date: | 2024-05-23 16:06:54 |
Message-ID: | CAMXrOMOY_ky6z8W4Fh=FoWdPB5xd12ZBeCj4JMqiu4eU7s97hQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Thank you for the valuable feedback. I see people are big fans of json
here.
On Thu, May 23, 2024 at 3:04 AM Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>
wrote:
> On Wed, 2024-05-22 at 22:38 -0500, Skorpeo Skorpeo wrote:
> > I was wondering if having unrelated columns in a table is a sound
> approach when
> > using json. In other words, if I have two collections of unrelated json
> objects,
> > for example "Users" and "Inventory", would it be ok to have one table
> with a
> > "Users" column and a "Inventory" column? My concern is that from a row
> > perspective the columns could be different lengths, such as more
> inventory
> > items as users. And for any given row the data in one column would have
> no
> > relation to another column. I would only query a single column at a time.
> >
> > Would this approach be ok or are there pitfalls such that it would be
> > advantageous/recommended to have a separate table for each column?
>
> It doesn't matter much if you use one or two columns.
> But the word "collection" makes me worry. Perhaps this article can give
> you some ideas:
>
> https://www.cybertec-postgresql.com/en/json-postgresql-how-to-use-it-right/
>
> Yours,
> Laurenz Albe
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Adrian Klaver | 2024-05-23 16:15:27 | Re: Json table/column design question |
Previous Message | Adrian Klaver | 2024-05-23 14:45:08 | Re: Restore of a reference database kills the auto analyze processing. |