Re: [HACKERS] The number of bytes is stored in index_size of pgstatindex() ?

From: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org, 大塚憲司 <otsuka(dot)kenji(at)nttcom(dot)co(dot)jp>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] The number of bytes is stored in index_size of pgstatindex() ?
Date: 2016-02-18 19:47:50
Message-ID: CAM3SWZTnT6A59=tmqRJPrG+XYvGi=EUjCeArd5y_BkuKuXvd4w@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs pgsql-hackers

I vote back patch. Subtle differences between the branches should be
avoided.

--
Peter Geoghegan

In response to

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2016-02-18 19:52:32 Re: [HACKERS] The number of bytes is stored in index_size of pgstatindex() ?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2016-02-18 19:33:10 Re: [HACKERS] The number of bytes is stored in index_size of pgstatindex() ?

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2016-02-18 19:52:32 Re: [HACKERS] The number of bytes is stored in index_size of pgstatindex() ?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2016-02-18 19:33:10 Re: [HACKERS] The number of bytes is stored in index_size of pgstatindex() ?