| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com> |
| Cc: | 大塚憲司 <otsuka(dot)kenji(at)nttcom(dot)co(dot)jp>, pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] The number of bytes is stored in index_size of pgstatindex() ? |
| Date: | 2016-02-18 19:33:10 |
| Message-ID: | 12435.1455823990@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-docs pgsql-hackers |
Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com> writes:
> On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 10:49 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> Yeah, that seems a bit strange to me as well. Should we change it to
>> count the root as an internal page, or is that going too far?
> I think we should change it. It seems like a bug to me.
Me too. Is it enough bug-like to be something to back-patch, or should
we just change it in HEAD?
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2016-02-18 19:47:50 | Re: [HACKERS] The number of bytes is stored in index_size of pgstatindex() ? |
| Previous Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2016-02-18 19:10:55 | Re: [DOCS] The number of bytes is stored in index_size of pgstatindex() ? |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2016-02-18 19:47:50 | Re: [HACKERS] The number of bytes is stored in index_size of pgstatindex() ? |
| Previous Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2016-02-18 19:10:55 | Re: [DOCS] The number of bytes is stored in index_size of pgstatindex() ? |