Re: Further issues with jsonb semantics, documentation

From: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Subject: Re: Further issues with jsonb semantics, documentation
Date: 2015-07-09 08:10:23
Message-ID: CAM3SWZROKcRSY0_96PtAMnRuirXbN=SpXNSs5JkD1fmHJ3NUWQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 6:19 PM, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 11:48 AM, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> wrote:
>> Please submit a patch to adjust the treatment of negative integers in the
>> old functions to be consistent with their treatment in the new functions.
>> i.e. in the range [-n,-1] they should refer to the corresponding element
>> counting from the right.
>
> This patch is attached, along with a separate patch which adds a
> release note compatibility item.

Where are we on this? This is currently a 9.5 release blocker.

--
Peter Geoghegan

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2015-07-09 08:41:48 Re: copy.c handling for RLS is insecure
Previous Message Haribabu Kommi 2015-07-09 07:36:04 Re: optimizing vacuum truncation scans