Re: Further issues with jsonb semantics, documentation

From: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Subject: Re: Further issues with jsonb semantics, documentation
Date: 2015-06-23 01:19:47
Message-ID: CAM3SWZSyWA+g9ygnRrYkvgmnu82fP1b=2wxLBPOWoOgZG83pPA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 11:48 AM, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> wrote:
> Please submit a patch to adjust the treatment of negative integers in the
> old functions to be consistent with their treatment in the new functions.
> i.e. in the range [-n,-1] they should refer to the corresponding element
> counting from the right.

This patch is attached, along with a separate patch which adds a
release note compatibility item.

See commit message for full details.

Thanks
--
Peter Geoghegan

Attachment Content-Type Size
0002-Release-note-compatibility-item.patch text/x-patch 1.1 KB
0001-Support-JSON-negative-array-subscripts-everywhere.patch text/x-patch 21.4 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2015-06-23 01:47:42 Re: less log level for success dynamic background workers for 9.5
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2015-06-23 01:14:36 Re: less log level for success dynamic background workers for 9.5