From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com> |
Cc: | Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
Subject: | Re: Further issues with jsonb semantics, documentation |
Date: | 2015-07-09 14:49:29 |
Message-ID: | 559E89F9.4090504@dunslane.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 07/09/2015 04:10 AM, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 6:19 PM, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com> wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 11:48 AM, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> wrote:
>>> Please submit a patch to adjust the treatment of negative integers in the
>>> old functions to be consistent with their treatment in the new functions.
>>> i.e. in the range [-n,-1] they should refer to the corresponding element
>>> counting from the right.
>> This patch is attached, along with a separate patch which adds a
>> release note compatibility item.
> Where are we on this? This is currently a 9.5 release blocker.
>
I am on vacation right now, but I might have some time tomorrow to deal
with it. If not, it will be Sunday or Monday when I get to it.
cheers
andrew
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Ildus Kurbangaliev | 2015-07-09 15:00:19 | Re: Waits monitoring |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2015-07-09 14:26:49 | Re: Re: [HACKERS] GSoC 2015 proposal: Improve the performance of “ALTER TABLE .. SET LOGGED / UNLOGGED” statement |