Re: ALTER TABLE lock strength reduction patch is unsafe

From: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>
To: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: ALTER TABLE lock strength reduction patch is unsafe
Date: 2014-01-24 06:08:33
Message-ID: CAM3SWZR5Gq-6gLA68RHUqiueneNBb2M0artJKwERH0ZWg+qLkQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 6:57 AM, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> v15 to fix the above problem.

Minor quibble: I get a compiler warning with the patch applied.
"relcache.c: In function ‘RememberToFreeTupleDescAtEOX’:
relcache.c:2317:3: warning: ISO C90 forbids mixed declarations and
code [-Werror=declaration-after-statement]".

--
Peter Geoghegan

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Marco Atzeri 2014-01-24 06:20:19 Re: Postgresql for cygwin - 3rd
Previous Message Amit Kapila 2014-01-24 05:11:49 Re: [bug fix] pg_ctl always uses the same event source