Re: Within CF app, "Bug Fixes" should be "Bug Fixes/Refactoring"

From: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Within CF app, "Bug Fixes" should be "Bug Fixes/Refactoring"
Date: 2015-10-29 20:29:15
Message-ID: CAM3SWZQp4bv3wDHGWFVui2D1aj2znqD_Xgz1xRYKbqFQwT47fw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 1:10 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Ditto. Bug fixes are not at all like refactoring --- in particular, we'd
> usually not consider refactoring as fit material for back-patching.
>
> "Refactoring" seems rather a narrow definition of what might show up
> in such a category, btw. Maybe "Code Beautification" would be a
> suitable title? I'm bikeshedding though.

I think that there is value in limiting the number of topics. But I
hardly but much weight on this. Any of the above are fine.

--
Peter Geoghegan

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Geoghegan 2015-10-29 20:46:01 Re: Are we sufficiently clear that jsonb containment is nested?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2015-10-29 20:16:40 Re: Are we sufficiently clear that jsonb containment is nested?