| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Within CF app, "Bug Fixes" should be "Bug Fixes/Refactoring" |
| Date: | 2015-10-29 20:10:31 |
| Message-ID: | 5136.1446149431@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 8:33 PM, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com> wrote:
>> I think that within the CF app, we should either rename the patch
>> topic "Bug Fixes" to "Bug Fixes/Refactoring", or introduce a new
>> "Refactoring" topic. I prefer the first approach.
> I would vote for the second approach, with a separate category for refactoring.
Ditto. Bug fixes are not at all like refactoring --- in particular, we'd
usually not consider refactoring as fit material for back-patching.
"Refactoring" seems rather a narrow definition of what might show up
in such a category, btw. Maybe "Code Beautification" would be a
suitable title? I'm bikeshedding though.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2015-10-29 20:14:44 | Re: Within CF app, "Bug Fixes" should be "Bug Fixes/Refactoring" |
| Previous Message | Mike Blackwell | 2015-10-29 20:10:04 | Re: Within CF app, "Bug Fixes" should be "Bug Fixes/Refactoring" |