From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com> |
Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Are we sufficiently clear that jsonb containment is nested? |
Date: | 2015-10-29 20:16:40 |
Message-ID: | 5301.1446149800@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com> writes:
> On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 8:05 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> I would be fine with adding a *compact* example of this kind to the
>> table that begins section 8.14.3. I probably would not back-patch it,
>> because the absence of that example is not an error in the
>> documentation, but I will not complain if someone else does.
> How about the attached? It's a compact refinement of my original
> example of more complicated jsonb containment.
You seem to have injected unrelated text into the middle of a discussion.
I think what you added is fine, but not where you put it; it would make
more sense as a standalone para.
I think the existing text is largely my fault, so I'll do something with
this.
> I still think it would be a good idea to go back to 9.4. I have reason
> to believe that people are getting confused on this point.
You didn't present evidence backing that up, but I agree that
clarification is a sufficient reason to back-patch doc changes.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2015-10-29 20:29:15 | Re: Within CF app, "Bug Fixes" should be "Bug Fixes/Refactoring" |
Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2015-10-29 20:14:44 | Re: Within CF app, "Bug Fixes" should be "Bug Fixes/Refactoring" |