Re: duplicated comments on get_relation_constraints

From: Kirill Reshke <reshkekirill(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Richard Guo <guofenglinux(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: jian he <jian(dot)universality(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: duplicated comments on get_relation_constraints
Date: 2025-03-28 16:38:36
Message-ID: CALdSSPg0g74msX901ERexFf7ENo+=1GLvbyHmUQtB1UtFrtExg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, 28 Mar 2025 at 15:19, Richard Guo <guofenglinux(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Mar 28, 2025 at 4:53 PM Kirill Reshke <reshkekirill(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > On Fri, 28 Mar 2025 at 09:47, jian he <jian(dot)universality(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > > The first "Also ignore if NO INHERIT and we weren't told that that's
> > > safe." is duplicated,
> > > also it's in the wrong place?
> > > The second one is fine.
>
> > Hi! Indeed. Looks like an oversight from ca87c41. I think we can
> > safely remove one of those, presumably the first one.
>
> +1. Also there is an extra blank line after the NO INHERIT check. I
> think we can remove it while we're here.
>
> Thanks
> Richard

Sure. PFA attached, if needed
--
Best regards,
Kirill Reshke

Attachment Content-Type Size
0001-Fixups-remove-empty-line-fix-oversight-of-ca87c41.patch application/octet-stream 1.1 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2025-03-28 16:42:48 Re: Proposal: Progressive explain
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2025-03-28 16:32:47 Re: On non-Windows, hard depend on uselocale(3)