| From: | Dev Kumkar <devdas(dot)kumkar(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Atri Sharma <atri(dot)jiit(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "pgsql-odbc(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-odbc(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [GENERAL] ODBC constructs |
| Date: | 2013-05-21 05:11:55 |
| Message-ID: | CALSLE1Nd6qCcywLqm7fCWF3FHP_iGDxCzHspEYf0f88QiQ+d_A@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-admin pgsql-general pgsql-odbc |
On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 9:12 PM, Atri Sharma <atri(dot)jiit(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> If you wish to work in C,then,I would suggest libpq.I would wait for more
> replies on this,as I have little knowledge
> about psqlODBC.
>
Thanks for the comments. Yes objective is to work in C and found libpq
useful but am not sure about psqlODBC.
It would be really great to get comments from community here regarding
comparison between both of them and also performance perspective. Based on
my reading so far libpq is good from performance perspective.
Regards...
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | John R Pierce | 2013-05-21 05:54:12 | Re: ODBC constructs |
| Previous Message | Atri Sharma | 2013-05-21 04:12:06 | Re: ODBC constructs |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | John R Pierce | 2013-05-21 05:54:12 | Re: ODBC constructs |
| Previous Message | Atri Sharma | 2013-05-21 04:12:06 | Re: ODBC constructs |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | John R Pierce | 2013-05-21 05:54:12 | Re: ODBC constructs |
| Previous Message | Atri Sharma | 2013-05-21 04:12:06 | Re: ODBC constructs |