From: | John R Pierce <pierce(at)hogranch(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: ODBC constructs |
Date: | 2013-05-21 05:54:12 |
Message-ID: | 519B0C04.8070102@hogranch.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin pgsql-general pgsql-odbc |
On 5/20/2013 10:11 PM, Dev Kumkar wrote:
> On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 9:12 PM, Atri Sharma <atri(dot)jiit(at)gmail(dot)com
> <mailto:atri(dot)jiit(at)gmail(dot)com>> wrote:
>
>
> If you wish to work in C,then,I would suggest libpq.I would wait
> for more replies on this,as I have little knowledge
> about psqlODBC.
>
>
> Thanks for the comments. Yes objective is to work in C and found libpq
> useful but am not sure about psqlODBC.
> It would be really great to get comments from community here regarding
> comparison between both of them and also performance perspective.
> Based on my reading so far libpq is good from performance perspective.
libpq lets you talk directly to postgres in its native tongue.
ODBC implements a sort of abstraction. IMHO, its like trying to type
with mittens on.
--
john r pierce 37N 122W
somewhere on the middle of the left coast
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Atri Sharma | 2013-05-21 06:04:10 | Re: ODBC constructs |
Previous Message | Dev Kumkar | 2013-05-21 05:11:55 | Re: [GENERAL] ODBC constructs |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Daniel Migowski | 2013-05-21 05:58:32 | Cross compile custom data types for Linux and windows |
Previous Message | Dev Kumkar | 2013-05-21 05:11:55 | Re: [GENERAL] ODBC constructs |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Atri Sharma | 2013-05-21 06:04:10 | Re: ODBC constructs |
Previous Message | Dev Kumkar | 2013-05-21 05:11:55 | Re: [GENERAL] ODBC constructs |