Re: ODBC constructs

From: John R Pierce <pierce(at)hogranch(dot)com>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: ODBC constructs
Date: 2013-05-21 05:54:12
Message-ID: 519B0C04.8070102@hogranch.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin pgsql-general pgsql-odbc

On 5/20/2013 10:11 PM, Dev Kumkar wrote:
> On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 9:12 PM, Atri Sharma <atri(dot)jiit(at)gmail(dot)com
> <mailto:atri(dot)jiit(at)gmail(dot)com>> wrote:
>
>
> If you wish to work in C,then,I would suggest libpq.I would wait
> for more replies on this,as I have little knowledge
> about psqlODBC.
>
>
> Thanks for the comments. Yes objective is to work in C and found libpq
> useful but am not sure about psqlODBC.
> It would be really great to get comments from community here regarding
> comparison between both of them and also performance perspective.
> Based on my reading so far libpq is good from performance perspective.

libpq lets you talk directly to postgres in its native tongue.

ODBC implements a sort of abstraction. IMHO, its like trying to type
with mittens on.

--
john r pierce 37N 122W
somewhere on the middle of the left coast

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Atri Sharma 2013-05-21 06:04:10 Re: ODBC constructs
Previous Message Dev Kumkar 2013-05-21 05:11:55 Re: [GENERAL] ODBC constructs

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Daniel Migowski 2013-05-21 05:58:32 Cross compile custom data types for Linux and windows
Previous Message Dev Kumkar 2013-05-21 05:11:55 Re: [GENERAL] ODBC constructs

Browse pgsql-odbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Atri Sharma 2013-05-21 06:04:10 Re: ODBC constructs
Previous Message Dev Kumkar 2013-05-21 05:11:55 Re: [GENERAL] ODBC constructs