Re: ODBC constructs

From: Atri Sharma <atri(dot)jiit(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: John R Pierce <pierce(at)hogranch(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: ODBC constructs
Date: 2013-05-21 06:04:10
Message-ID: FFB34F28-622B-4C12-A4D7-24B6CAD6073F@gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin pgsql-general pgsql-odbc

Sent from my iPad

On 21-May-2013, at 11:24, John R Pierce <pierce(at)hogranch(dot)com> wrote:

> libpq lets you talk directly to postgres in its native tongue.
>
> ODBC implements a sort of abstraction. IMHO, its like trying to type with mittens on.
>
Also,I see no point in working using ODBC with Postgres if you want to work in C,when libpq is
available.IMHO,it is like adding an extra layer without any purpose,or I may be wrong here.

Also,is it only me,or are we all a bit wary of ODBC? I think JDBC is becoming the standard now(of course,its Java,but as I said, you should use libpq if you want to write native code for Postgres).

Regards,

Atri

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message John R Pierce 2013-05-21 06:12:10 Re: ODBC constructs
Previous Message John R Pierce 2013-05-21 05:54:12 Re: ODBC constructs

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message John R Pierce 2013-05-21 06:09:56 Re: Cross compile custom data types for Linux and windows
Previous Message Daniel Migowski 2013-05-21 05:58:32 Cross compile custom data types for Linux and windows

Browse pgsql-odbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message John R Pierce 2013-05-21 06:12:10 Re: ODBC constructs
Previous Message John R Pierce 2013-05-21 05:54:12 Re: ODBC constructs