Re: Documentation update of wal_retrieve_retry_interval to mention table sync worker

From: vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Documentation update of wal_retrieve_retry_interval to mention table sync worker
Date: 2025-01-13 07:03:38
Message-ID: CALDaNm1_v-+Y3rPYS_c9DRNJGui66LHuc1vAq1d95=y8EiqDkg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, 6 Jan 2025 at 08:47, Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Hi Vignesh,
>
> Some review comments for your v2 patch.
>
> ======
> doc/src/sgml/logical-replication.sgml
>
> AFAICT the only difference you made is changing:
> FROM "a special kind of apply process"
> TO "a special kind of table synchronization worker process".
>
> There is only ONE kind of tablesync process, so I think saying "a
> special kind of table synchronization worker process" seems
> misleading. I also thought maybe it is better to mention that this is
> PER table.
>
> SUGGESTION:
> ... a special table synchronization worker process per table.

Thanks, the updated v3 version patch has the changes for the same.

Regards,
Vignesh

Attachment Content-Type Size
v3-0001-Improve-documentation-on-table-synchronization-wo.patch text/x-patch 4.1 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Smith 2025-01-13 07:18:28 Re: Introduce XID age and inactive timeout based replication slot invalidation
Previous Message Peter Smith 2025-01-13 06:52:15 Re: POC: enable logical decoding when wal_level = 'replica' without a server restart