Re: Schemas vs partitioning vs multiple databases for archiving

From: Chris Travers <chris(dot)travers(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Gavin Flower <GavinFlower(at)archidevsys(dot)co(dot)nz>
Cc: Bartel Viljoen <bartel(at)ncc(dot)co(dot)za>, "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Schemas vs partitioning vs multiple databases for archiving
Date: 2012-08-19 05:50:34
Message-ID: CAKt_Zfu4qKgfBF_YPd9V37Qdw7CNRSQL5vV9ShVQ=Gx1rQxedA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 9:30 PM, Gavin Flower <GavinFlower(at)archidevsys(dot)co(dot)nz
> wrote:

> On 18/08/12 20:05, Bartel Viljoen wrote:
>
> [...]
> ****
>
> I’m in the design faze of a new GUI and DB layout, what are my options.
>
> [...]
> I think you meant phase!
> (Spell checkers can be quite stupid!)
>

Could be worse.... See the post here entitled "When Spellcheckers Attack."

http://blog.oup.com/2007/11/spellchecker/

Best Wishes,
Chris Travers

>
>
> Cheers,
> Gavin
>
>
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Gavin Flower 2012-08-19 06:04:39 Re: Schemas vs partitioning vs multiple databases for archiving
Previous Message Gavin Flower 2012-08-19 05:08:42 Re: Messy data models (Re: Visualize database schema)