| From: | Sumeet Jauhar <sumeet(dot)jauhar(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "bnicholson(at)hp(dot)com" <bnicholson(at)hp(dot)com>, "pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Suspected Postgres Datacorruption |
| Date: | 2011-08-05 02:58:55 |
| Message-ID: | CAKN1Xtp-Qu3vXkX29iu549NkG4bAgxXCyztS61-LVFGDsmV-Wg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-admin pgsql-performance |
Thank you . Scott and Brad . Valuable information for sure . I plan to
browse through the documentation for Postgres 9 and identify all the
potential advantages that it will bring to our application . As
rightly pointed out 8.2 may be on the path to obsolescence .
On Friday, August 5, 2011, Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 8:40 PM, Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> then you should really do so. The changes to things like autovacuum
>> getting multi-threaded (8.3) HOT updates (8.3) on disk tracking of
>
> Wait, multithreaded autovac may have been put in place in 8.2 .
> Anyway, my points still stand, just might be off a version here or
> there.
>
>
> --
> To understand recursion, one must first understand recursion.
>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2011-08-05 03:05:07 | Re: Suspected Postgres Datacorruption |
| Previous Message | Scott Marlowe | 2011-08-05 02:41:35 | Re: Suspected Postgres Datacorruption |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2011-08-05 03:05:07 | Re: Suspected Postgres Datacorruption |
| Previous Message | Scott Marlowe | 2011-08-05 02:41:35 | Re: Suspected Postgres Datacorruption |