| From: | Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Sumeet Jauhar <sumeet(dot)jauhar(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | bnicholson(at)hp(dot)com, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Suspected Postgres Datacorruption |
| Date: | 2011-08-05 02:41:35 |
| Message-ID: | CAOR=d=29FL3QpY9P2k_yF_24wDMYMkLiK_z3bQpRzxzYDfpciA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-admin pgsql-performance |
On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 8:40 PM, Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> then you should really do so. The changes to things like autovacuum
> getting multi-threaded (8.3) HOT updates (8.3) on disk tracking of
Wait, multithreaded autovac may have been put in place in 8.2 .
Anyway, my points still stand, just might be off a version here or
there.
--
To understand recursion, one must first understand recursion.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Sumeet Jauhar | 2011-08-05 02:58:55 | Re: Suspected Postgres Datacorruption |
| Previous Message | Scott Marlowe | 2011-08-05 02:40:05 | Re: Suspected Postgres Datacorruption |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Sumeet Jauhar | 2011-08-05 02:58:55 | Re: Suspected Postgres Datacorruption |
| Previous Message | Scott Marlowe | 2011-08-05 02:40:05 | Re: Suspected Postgres Datacorruption |