Re: Not-terribly-safe checks for CRC intrinsic support

From: "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Steven Niu <niushiji(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Not-terribly-safe checks for CRC intrinsic support
Date: 2025-03-17 02:01:49
Message-ID: CAKFQuwb5e-piudS5mdeRK0N93=BSkBD0yR=EZ8A3mbTzkpLftA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sunday, March 16, 2025, Steven Niu <niushiji(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

>
> +# is missing, we must link not just compile, and store the results in
> global
>
> The "compile" should be "compiler"?
>

No. Compile is the verb that pairs with link. Compiler is a noun, its
compliment being the linker.

I’d probably add a comma before the “not” though. Or maybe: we must also
link and store the results in global

Doesn’t link imply compilation?

David J.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2025-03-17 02:13:01 Re: Not-terribly-safe checks for CRC intrinsic support
Previous Message Tom Lane 2025-03-17 01:56:19 Re: Not-terribly-safe checks for CRC intrinsic support