Re: Not-terribly-safe checks for CRC intrinsic support

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Steven Niu <niushiji(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Not-terribly-safe checks for CRC intrinsic support
Date: 2025-03-17 01:56:19
Message-ID: 3894870.1742176579@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Steven Niu <niushiji(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> +# is missing, we must link not just compile, and store the results in
> global

> The "compile" should be "compiler"?

I think it's okay as-is: "link" and "compile" are both being used
as verbs. We could say "run the compiler", but that's longer
without being better.

Besides which, I stole this comment verbatim from elsewhere
in the same file ;-)

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David G. Johnston 2025-03-17 02:01:49 Re: Not-terribly-safe checks for CRC intrinsic support
Previous Message Steven Niu 2025-03-17 01:43:26 Re: Not-terribly-safe checks for CRC intrinsic support