Re: Not-terribly-safe checks for CRC intrinsic support

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Steven Niu <niushiji(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Not-terribly-safe checks for CRC intrinsic support
Date: 2025-03-17 02:13:01
Message-ID: 3896540.1742177581@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

"David G. Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Sunday, March 16, 2025, Steven Niu <niushiji(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> +# is missing, we must link not just compile, and store the results in
>> global

> I’d probably add a comma before the “not” though. Or maybe: we must also
> link and store the results in global

A comma there wouldn't be wrong, but in context that would make for
an overabundance of commas. Or so it seems to me anyway.

> Doesn’t link imply compilation?

Yes.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2025-03-17 02:49:49 Re: TOAST versus toast
Previous Message David G. Johnston 2025-03-17 02:01:49 Re: Not-terribly-safe checks for CRC intrinsic support