Re: A minor bug in the doc of "SQL Functions Returning Sets" in xfunc.sgml.

On Thu, Jul 18, 2024 at 9:05 PM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:

> "David G. Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > On Thu, Jul 18, 2024 at 7:10 PM Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
> wrote:
> >> Not sure that this is worth changing. The examples work OK when taken
> >> in isolation or are able to demonstrate the point they want to show.
> >> In short, not all these queries are here to be compatible with the
> >> contents in the same area. See for example the case of the "nodes"
> >> table on the same page, created nowhere. "tab" is just a more generic
> >> table name that's more spread.
>
> > Clearly this page repeatedly expects tab.x to exist; and for these
> queries
> > to be executable. This seems like the least invasive way to make that
> > expectation reality.
>
> I'm with Michael here. Only in the tutorial do we expect there to be
> a continuing thread of commands that you can just copy-and-paste and
> expect to work. I do not think it's reasonable to extend that policy
> to the rest of the manual: in other places, there are too many
> distinct topics under consideration and too much reason to make
> localized changes.
>
>
So much for leaving a place a little nicer when you leave than when you
arrived...

David J.