Re: n_ins_since_vacuum stats for aborted transactions

From: "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Sami Imseih <samimseih(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Euler Taveira <euler(at)eulerto(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: n_ins_since_vacuum stats for aborted transactions
Date: 2025-04-09 18:49:07
Message-ID: CAKFQuwYW4oKO647uacHJ5y=NWR9p6G=wDdSjWzwPJbP5G-V_fg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Apr 9, 2025 at 11:32 AM Sami Imseih <samimseih(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> The purpose of b07642dbcd8d is to trigger autovacuum for append only/mainly
> workloads that don't generate dead tuples.
>
>
Why does counting or not counting the dead tuples matter? Forget original
purpose, is there presently a bug or not? Between the two options the one
where we count dead tuples makes more sense on its face.

David J.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Sami Imseih 2025-04-09 18:57:44 Re: n_ins_since_vacuum stats for aborted transactions
Previous Message Daniel Gustafsson 2025-04-09 18:45:06 Re: Adding support for SSLKEYLOGFILE in the frontend